Prevention Protocol: Tobacco Industry Relationship Screening

Prevention through proper screening is more effective than addressing conflicts after they emerge. This screening protocol helps tobacco control organizations identify tobacco industry connections before entering into partnerships or collaborations. Prevention is more effective than remediation.

Use this along with the Tobacco Industry Actors Database developed by the Knowledge Hub (WHO FCTC Knowledge Hub for Article 5.3 – Resource Database on Tobacco Industry Interference) and Global Center for Good Governance in Tobacco Control (GGTC).

Application

New Partnerships

Before forming new partnerships or coalitions with other organizations

Funding Decisions

Prior to accepting funding from any source to ensure independence

Personnel Selection

When considering new board members or key staff positions

Joint Activities

Before participating in multi-stakeholder initiatives or planning joint activities

Screening Process

Basic Information Review

Organization's Website

Review the organization's website, particularly:

  • "About Us" section and leadership
  • Board of directors list
  • Funding sources and annual reports
  • Partners and affiliates

Organization's Name

Search for the organization name + "tobacco industry" online

Online Verification

Search the organization’s name along with keywords like "tobacco industry" and check industry front group databases.

Policy Alignment

Analyze the organization's public stance on tobacco control for any signs of alignment with industry narratives.

Direct Connection Assessment

Financial Ties

Check for direct funding from tobacco industries or subsidiaries and engagement in industry CSR initiatives linked to tobacco control.

Personnel Links

Identify board members or leadership with current or past tobacco industry roles or backgrounds.

Collaborative Activities

Look for joint initiatives with tobacco industry entities, participation in panel discussions, or partnerships with known tobacco industry allies.

Public Positioning

Review public statements and social media accounts for support of tobacco industry positions or history of advancing industry-aligned arguments.

Ally Partnerships

Identify collaborations or affiliations with widely recognized allies of the tobacco industry.

Established Links

Check for a history of industry alignment, including evidence of direct or indirect benefit from tobacco actors.

CSR Engagement

Examine participation in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) projects initiated by the tobacco industry.

Other Associations

Note any other forms of collaboration, affiliation, or benefit derived from tobacco industry relationships.

Indirect Connection Assessment

Secondary Funding

Funding from organizations that receive direct or indirect tobacco industry support.

Non-Tobacco Collaborations

Joint initiatives on non-tobacco issues with tobacco industry entities, including in conferences or panel discussions.

Affiliated Group Memberships

Participation in groups, networks, or coalitions where tobacco industry actors are in leadership or hold significant influence.

Unclear Industry Alignment

History of promoting tobacco industry-aligned positions, even when formal ties or funding are not evident.

CSR Engagement (Non-Tobacco)

Involvement in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) efforts initiated by tobacco companies that are not directly related to tobacco control.

Other Related Activities

Any other indirect form of association, benefit, or collaboration that could imply alignment with the tobacco industry.

Transparency Verification & Decision Standard

Request in Writing

  • Disclosure of all funding sources and partnerships
  • Board member affiliations
  • Conflict of interest policies, particularly, written position or policy on tobacco industry engagement

Decision Standard

There is only one acceptable standard: no tobacco industry connections of any kind. The organization must:

Have no direct or indirect tobacco industry connections

Maintain strong conflict of interest policies

Demonstrate clear commitment to tobacco control objectives, particularly, denounce all types of tobacco industry engagements

When in Doubt & Documentation

Document Uncertainties

Record specific areas where screening results are unclear

Apply Precaution

Prioritize public health using the precautionary principle

Independent Assessment

Request review from third parties recognized for upholding WHO FCTC Article 5.3

Complete Documentation

Record organization details, sources consulted, findings, and follow-up actions

Real-World Example & Resources

Prevention Success Story
A regional tobacco control coalition performed due diligence on a potential partner organization that claimed to be independent. The screening revealed 15% of funding came from a tobacco industry foundation, a board member previously served at a tobacco industry consulting firm, and the organization had published position papers aligned with industry arguments on taxation.

By identifying these connections before engagement, the coalition avoided potential division and reputational damage. Governments were prevented from engaging with the organization as it continued to promote tobacco industry arguments.

ANNEX: Definition of the Tobacco Industry

Tobacco manufacturers, wholesalers, importers, and exporters

Companies directly involved in the production and distribution of tobacco products

Parent, subsidiary, and affiliate companies of tobacco manufacturers

All related corporate entities connected to tobacco manufacturing companies

Organizations or individuals representing tobacco industry interests
  • Law firms representing tobacco companies
  • Public relations companies working for the tobacco industry
  • Consultants and lobbyists advancing industry positions
Organizations receiving funding from the tobacco industry
  • Front groups and third-party allies
  • Research institutions accepting tobacco funding
  • Foundations established by tobacco companies
Entities that work to further tobacco industry interests
  • Industry-established "corporate social responsibility" initiatives
  • Organizations promoting "reduced-harm" products while opposing evidence-based measures aligned with the WHO FCTC
  • Entities that consistently advance tobacco industry policy positions

In accordance with WHO FCTC Article 5.3 Guidelines, tobacco industry entities include, but are not limited to the categories listed above. [i]

[i] Preventing Tobacco Industry Interference. A Toolkit for Advocates and Policymakers. GGTC. 2023. Available at:
https://files.ggtc.world/uploads/2024-02-01/03-07-53-470050/GGTC%20Toolkit%20(Redesign)%20171123.pdf

NOTE: This represents minimum standards only. Organizations should adapt and strengthen these materials to address their specific context and evolving industry tactics, provided all modifications enhance protection against tobacco industry interference.

CourageAgainstTobacco.org Resources

This forms part of a suite of tools designed to support advocates in holding tobacco companies and their front groups accountable:

Prevention Protocol: Tobacco Industry Relationship Screening ← You are here
Click to open: Prevention Protocol: Tobacco Industry Relationship Screening
How can advocates be protected from tobacco industry’s tactics?
Click to open: How can advocates be protected from tobacco industry’s tactics?
Conflict of Interest
Click to open: Conflict of Interest